| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/12/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/12/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
CROZARA, A. S.; EIFERT, E. da C.; MAGNABOSCO, C. de U.; COSTA, M. F. O. e; LOPES, F. B.; GUIMARÃES, N. C.; BRUNES, L. C.; SOARES, B. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
EDUARDO DA COSTA EIFERT, CPAC; CLAUDIO DE ULHOA MAGNABOSCO, CPAC; MARCOS FERNANDO OLIVEIRA E COSTA, CNPAF. |
|
Título: |
Correlation between residual feed intake and daily water intake in confined nellore bulls. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 55.; CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ZOOTECNIA, 28., 2018, Goiânia. Construindo saberes, formando pessoas e transformando a produção animal: anais eletrônicos. Goiânia: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2018. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Identifying efficient animals is an alternative to reduce food costs and natural resources used in farming. The objective of this study was to identify the correlation between Residual Feed intake (RFI) and Daily Water Consumption (DWC) in Nellore cattle. The work was realized at Núcleo Regional of Embrapa Cerrados, in June, 2017. Were used 44 bulls, aged between 18 and 21 months and initial weight of 455 kg. The diet was given twice daily, with corn silage: concentrate of 60:40. Feed intake was obtained in the feeders of Intergado System. Daily water consumption was measured by water drinked in electronic drinking fountains coupled to the automatic scales (Intergado System TM) plus water from feed. The RFI was calculated by means of the difference between the observed dry matter intake (DMIobs) and the expected dry matter intake (DMIexp) based on live weight (LW) and average daily gain (ADG). The descriptive statistics, comparison of means by Tukey test at 5% probability and Pearson correlations for the study traits were performed using software R (version 3.3.2). Groups of high, low and mean RFI were formed with one Standar Desviation of the mean RFI. The water consumption averaged 38.9 L / day, with a standard deviation of 6.1 L / d, and a minimum value of 30.0 and a maximum of 62.2 L / day. The RFI had zero and standard deviation of 1.01 kg / d, with a minimum value of -2.38 and a maximum of 2.7. The correlation between RFI and DWC was .24, being considered of low magnitude. It was not observed differences between RFI groups, with means of 37.0, 38.8 and 42.3 L / d, respectively, to Low, Medium and High RFI Groups. We concluded that water intake was not correlated with RFI in Nellore bulls confined in the early dry season of Brazil. MenosIdentifying efficient animals is an alternative to reduce food costs and natural resources used in farming. The objective of this study was to identify the correlation between Residual Feed intake (RFI) and Daily Water Consumption (DWC) in Nellore cattle. The work was realized at Núcleo Regional of Embrapa Cerrados, in June, 2017. Were used 44 bulls, aged between 18 and 21 months and initial weight of 455 kg. The diet was given twice daily, with corn silage: concentrate of 60:40. Feed intake was obtained in the feeders of Intergado System. Daily water consumption was measured by water drinked in electronic drinking fountains coupled to the automatic scales (Intergado System TM) plus water from feed. The RFI was calculated by means of the difference between the observed dry matter intake (DMIobs) and the expected dry matter intake (DMIexp) based on live weight (LW) and average daily gain (ADG). The descriptive statistics, comparison of means by Tukey test at 5% probability and Pearson correlations for the study traits were performed using software R (version 3.3.2). Groups of high, low and mean RFI were formed with one Standar Desviation of the mean RFI. The water consumption averaged 38.9 L / day, with a standard deviation of 6.1 L / d, and a minimum value of 30.0 and a maximum of 62.2 L / day. The RFI had zero and standard deviation of 1.01 kg / d, with a minimum value of -2.38 and a maximum of 2.7. The correlation between RFI and DWC was .24, being considered of low magnit... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura de Precisão; Água; Alimento Animal; Bovino; Gado Nelore. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/188386/1/Adriano-zootec-2018.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02696nam a2200253 a 4500
001 2101091
005 2018-12-13
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCROZARA, A. S.
245 $aCorrelation between residual feed intake and daily water intake in confined nellore bulls.
260 $aIn: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 55.; CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ZOOTECNIA, 28., 2018, Goiânia. Construindo saberes, formando pessoas e transformando a produção animal: anais eletrônicos. Goiânia: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia$c2018
520 $aIdentifying efficient animals is an alternative to reduce food costs and natural resources used in farming. The objective of this study was to identify the correlation between Residual Feed intake (RFI) and Daily Water Consumption (DWC) in Nellore cattle. The work was realized at Núcleo Regional of Embrapa Cerrados, in June, 2017. Were used 44 bulls, aged between 18 and 21 months and initial weight of 455 kg. The diet was given twice daily, with corn silage: concentrate of 60:40. Feed intake was obtained in the feeders of Intergado System. Daily water consumption was measured by water drinked in electronic drinking fountains coupled to the automatic scales (Intergado System TM) plus water from feed. The RFI was calculated by means of the difference between the observed dry matter intake (DMIobs) and the expected dry matter intake (DMIexp) based on live weight (LW) and average daily gain (ADG). The descriptive statistics, comparison of means by Tukey test at 5% probability and Pearson correlations for the study traits were performed using software R (version 3.3.2). Groups of high, low and mean RFI were formed with one Standar Desviation of the mean RFI. The water consumption averaged 38.9 L / day, with a standard deviation of 6.1 L / d, and a minimum value of 30.0 and a maximum of 62.2 L / day. The RFI had zero and standard deviation of 1.01 kg / d, with a minimum value of -2.38 and a maximum of 2.7. The correlation between RFI and DWC was .24, being considered of low magnitude. It was not observed differences between RFI groups, with means of 37.0, 38.8 and 42.3 L / d, respectively, to Low, Medium and High RFI Groups. We concluded that water intake was not correlated with RFI in Nellore bulls confined in the early dry season of Brazil.
650 $aAgricultura de Precisão
650 $aÁgua
650 $aAlimento Animal
650 $aBovino
650 $aGado Nelore
700 1 $aEIFERT, E. da C.
700 1 $aMAGNABOSCO, C. de U.
700 1 $aCOSTA, M. F. O. e
700 1 $aLOPES, F. B.
700 1 $aGUIMARÃES, N. C.
700 1 $aBRUNES, L. C.
700 1 $aSOARES, B. B.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Catálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Instrumentação; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste; Embrapa Rondônia; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Solos; Embrapa Trigo; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. MenosCatálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Acre; Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Instrumentação; Embrapa Meio-Norte... Mostrar Todas |
|
Identificador: |
3547 |
|
Data corrente: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/05/2017 |
|
Código do título: |
0900701 |
|
Código CCN: |
095505-1 |
|
Título e Subtítulo: |
A GRANJA DO ANO |
|
Título anterior: |
QUEM E QUEM NA AGRICULTURA BRASILEIRA |
|
Entidade: |
Editora Centaurus Ltda. |
|
Local de publicação: |
Porto Alegre, RS |
|
Periodicidade: |
Anual |
|
Editora: |
Centaurus Ltda. |
|
Inicio de publicação: |
1986 |
|
Coleções da unidade: |
Embrapa Acre
1986-89 (1-4); 1999/2000 (14)
Classificação: 630.5
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste
1986-93 1-7; 1994-02 9-16; 2003-07 18-21; 2009-11 24-27; 2014 (29); 2015 (30); 2016 (31); 2017/2018 (32)
Embrapa Algodão
1987/2005 1987-1990; 1995/96; 2001/2002; 2004/2005
Classificação: 630.5
Embrapa Amapá
1987 2; 1988 (3); 1990 5; 1991/92 6; 1992/93 7
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental
1986 1(1); 1987 1(2); 1988 1(3); 1989 1(4); 1990 1(5); 1992/93 1(7)
Classificação: 630.5G3
Embrapa Cerrados
1986(1); 1988(3); 1989(4); 1990(5); 1991/92(6); 1992/93(7); 1993/94(8); 1994/95(9); 1995/96(10); 1996/97(11); 1997/98(12); 1998/99(13); 1999/2000(14); 2000/01(15); 2001/02(16); 2006/07(21)
Classificação: 630.5
Embrapa Florestas
1987/1988 (2); 1988(3); 1998/1999 (13); 1999/2000 (14); 2000/2001 (15); 2002/2003 (17); 2007/2008 (22)
Embrapa Instrumentação
1999/2000 (14); 2001/2002 (16); 2002/2003 (17); 2003/2004 (18); 2005/2006 (20).
Classificação: 636.505
Embrapa Meio-Norte
1987-1995/96 (2-10); 1996/97 (11); 1997/98 (12); 1998/99 (13); 1999/2000 (14); 2002/03(17); 2003/04(18); 2004/2005(19); 2019/2020 (34)
Classificação: 630.5
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste
1987 2; 1983 3; 1989 4; 1990 5; 1991 6; 1992 7; 2010 (24); 2012 26 27; 2013 28
Embrapa Rondônia
1978 (Ed/78); 1986 1(1); 1987/88 (2-3); 1990 (5); 1991/92 (6); 1994/95 (9); 1995/96 (10); 1999/00 (14); 2002/04 (17/18); 2004/05 19; 2005/06 20; 2006/2007 26; 2012/2013 27; 2013/2014 28; 2014/2015 2015/2016 30; 2017/2018 32; 2018/2019
Classificação: 630.5
Embrapa Semiárido
1987,1988 2; 1988 3; 1989 4; 1991,1992 6; 1992,1993 7; 1994,1995 9; 1995,1996 10; 1998/1999 13; 1999/2000 14; 2000/2001 15; 2001/2002 16; 2002/2003 17; 2004/2005 19; 2005/2006; 2008/2009; 2009/2010; 2010/2011.
Embrapa Soja
1987-89 (2-4); 1991-94 (6-8); 1995/96 (10); 1998-99 (13-14); 2000/01 (15); 2001/02 (16); 2002/03 (17); 2003/04 (18); 2005/06 (20); 2006/07 (21); 2008/2009 (23); 2009/10 (24); 2010/2011 (25); 2011/2012 (26); 2015/2016 (30-31); 2017/2018 (32); 2019/2020 (34); 2020/2021 (35); 2021/2022 (36);
Embrapa Solos
1986-89 (1-4); 1995-99 (10-13); 1999/2000 (14); 2000/2001 (15); 2001/2002 (16); 2002/2003 (17); 2003/2004 (18); 2004/2005 (19)
Classificação: 630.5
Embrapa Trigo
1986 (1); 1987 (2); 1988 (3); 1989 (4); 1992 (7); 1993 (8); 1994 (9); 1995 (10); 1997 (12); 1998 (13); 1999 (14); 2002 (17); 2006 (20); 2010 (25); 2011 (26); 2013 (28); 2014 (29); 2015 (30); 2016 (31); 2018 (33); 2019 (34), 2021(36); 2022/2023(37); 2023/2024
Classificação: 630.5
Embrapa Uva e Vinho
1986 1; 1988-89 3-4; 1992-93 7-8; 1996/1997(11); 1999 14; 2000/2001(15); 2001/2002(16); 2002/2003(17); 2004-05 (19); 2006(21); 2007/2008(22); 2008/2009(23); 2011/2012(26)
Classificação: 630 |
|
Fechar
|
|
|
